Back in 2002, when I was writing up the process of deciding what car to buy next, I received an email from someone at Renault F1. He was interested in my choice between a Mini Cooper S and the Renault Clio Cup, as he’d just had the same decision to make, but plumped for the Clio.
During a brief email conversation, I wished him well for the forthcoming F1 season, secretly expecting Renault to have a nightmare. He replied to say that he was looking forward to it as Alonso seemed every bit as good as Schumacher when he was with Benetton.
Fast forward 3 years and look who’s world champion. It’s daft, but Alonso’s title feels special for me, as I feel like I was let in on a secret from the start. And to celebrate, I might just replace the Mini with a Clio Cup after all. :)
Yep, it’s a not-disguised-at-all Google bomb. I just want to make sure that people searching for “Mal Ross” find this page first. Minimal used to make up nearly every hit on the first page, but it’s taken a slide recently. My sole mirror project photo is top rank at the moment, for Pete’s sake. Hopefully, this post’ll kick me back up the rankings from my name being in the <title>
tag and an <h2>
.
Vain? Moi? ;)
So, here I am, sat in Fawdington BMW’s hospitality area, waiting for repairs to my car to be completed. I spy an internet terminal and, after a few minor hassles, manage to access to the web. Sadly, I can’t check my email, as the terminal’s using the company’s standard website-blocking settings i.e. GMail’s locked out. Thankfully, not everything’s blocked, so I still manage to read a very good post at xlab as well as a number of other regular haunts.
Then I decide to see whether anyone’s commented on my recent posts here (as if!). Lo and behold, what do I see?
Your organization’s Internet use policy restricts access to this web page at this time.
Gah! You mean the employees can’t read my glowing reviews of their service?!? Maybe that’s not such a bad thing, considering what I’ll be saying in an upcoming post... ;-)
P.S. they didn’t stop me blogging from their terminal, mind. He he.
You may have noticed a swanky ‘read more’-type link on the previous post. Blogger’s Help pages have shown how to do this for a while, but with the drawback that the link would appear regardless of whether the post was summarised. They left the fix as “an exercise for the reader”. Which I guess means they didn’t have an elegant solution. :-/
Now, however, I’ve finally found a nice way of doing it. It relies on CSS2, however, which isn’t supported in all browsers. Still, it’s good enough for me on Firefox (apologies to IE6 users). It was a bit of a bitch to find, mind, hence this post. Hopefully, it’ll show up well on a Google search.
There are still some parts of test driven development that I'm not 100% comfortable with. Sometimes, for example, I’ll be writing a unit test for a method in class A that, it turns out, needs to call a method in class B to do its thing. Only problem is that class B’s method doesn’t exist yet. So I stub it and my test fails. Hurrah.
Now, however, I’ve got methods in two classes that aren’t fully implemented. Really, the method in class B should be covered by its own unit test before I start calling it from elsewhere. So I write a failing test for that method too. I now have 2 failing tests at the same time. This is something that, from my understanding of the literature, should be avoided. So, what should I do to avoid it? [more...]
One solution might be to write class B and its methods before I even touch class A. However, if I do that, I’m risking creating an interface that isn’t suitable for use by class A. I’d be trying to predict future use of the class. Instead, shouldn’t I be driving the development of the class B’s interface by developing class A and uncovering its interface requirements?
Of course, if I do develop class A first, we get to the situation described above: multiple failing tests. In fact, it could easily cascade further if class B’s method required a call to a method in class C. Et cetera, ad infinitum. So, what do I actually do?
At the moment, the approach I’m taking is the first one. I have multiple failing tests. I find this preferable as it avoids trying to predict required interfaces—something I’ve already had bad experiences with. However, as soon as I realise I’ve got to write a second unit test before getting the first to pass, I give the first an Ignore attribute in NUnit. The text I put in the Ignore attribute is something like "Added to Ignore stack: 28-Sep-05 11:30". Once I get the second test to pass, I look back for any ignored tests in the NUnit GUI and continue work on the test with the most recent Ignore stack date.
One thing that this approach requires, however, is that you don’t have any other tests ignored in your test suite. Otherwise, it’s too easy to forget the Ignore stack exists. If you’re currently ignoring a set of tests based on them taking a long time to run, think about using the Category attribute instead.
This month’s Professional Developers’ Conference (“PDC”) saw the unveiling of another new user interface for Microsoft Office. Expect 3rd party library vendors such as Divelements to go into overdrive in an attempt to get this look in the hands of developers before Vista even launches.
My reaction, as a developer, is a mixture of excitement and resignation. Although it’s unlikely to ever happen, it would be nice if Microsoft could coordinate new UI such as this with the basic controls and style guides provided by and for the operating system. Ah well, one can dream. As a future user of the software, I’m intrigued. The reasons they give for the changes are good ones, but I’m reserving judgement till I’ve had a good play.
Went to see a preview screening of Serenity on Tuesday night. I’ve never been in a cinema where people clapped and cheered the film before. Twas all a bit surreal.
As for the film itself, it was really good. Already being a fan of the Firefly series (rent buy it!), I had high hopes for the movie. In fact, I was a little concerned that it couldn’t live up to my expectations. Thankfully, it exceeded them, with a few surprises and some real “A-ha!” moments along the way.
Given that I knew the characters before entering the cinema, I did of course have a different perspective to any newcomers watching the film. I think Joss Whedon did a reasonable job of introducing the main players and their backgrounds, but only time, critics’ reviews and box office takings will really tell. For my two penn’th, however, I reckon it’s well worth seeing. High quality, no nonsense sci-fi with a liberal sprinkling of humour. 9 out of 10.
Or should that be 10?
The Vessels split [drownedinsound.com]
There I was, listening to the wonderful, lilting Autumn Sounds come onto iTunes, thinking how long it had been since I’d heard anything from The Vessels’ mailing list. Surely I’d missed a gig or two by now? Maybe even a new album? As it turns out, I’ve missed a lot more. They’ve split up. In fact, they split up over a year and a half ago. D’oh! :(
Have to say, I’m gutted. It might be a bit pathetic, but they were one of those bands that very few people had heard of, but who made wonderful music and were like my little secret. I was sure they were destined for big things. Lazily likened to The Thrills (perhaps that was their undoing), they played a light, upbeat blend of poppy, country-esque indie and were an absolute delight live. They will be missed—by me, at least.
If this page starts looking a little unattended, it’ll be because I’m spending most of my blogging time over at Reiver Games. It’s a rather technical blog (a diary of C# game/tool development, aimed at other developers and beta testers), so it might not be to everyone’s taste. Still, at least it explains where I’ve gone.
Oh, and at the end of the month, there’ll be a mammoth post here about my experiences trying to get my car fixed. You have been warned. :)
I reckon my car’s jinxed. Over the weekend, someone drove into it, damaging the rear bumper beyond repair. Once it’s replaced, I’ll be onto my 4th rear bumper (and my 3rd front bumper) in just over 2½ years. Admittedly, I’m counting the original, undamaged bumpers that were replaced by the bodykit, but it’s still some going. :(
If you’re into tabletop games, you could do far worse than give Carcassonne a look. Having played it (till my head hurt) quite a bit over recent weeks, I’m blown away by how perfect a game it is. The rules are staggeringly simple, the strategy simple enough for a beginner to pick up (yet subtle enough to reward experience), and the games themselves last less than an hour. In my book, that ticks all of the boxes perfectly. Highly recommended.
Owen completes move to Newcastle [BBC Sport]
I’m definitely struggling to believe this is happening. Look! He’s got a Newcastle shirt on! WTF?! :-)
Update: HOLY SHIT! As I’ve spent nearly every waking hour of the last few days programming, I’ve completely missed these goings on too:
Ermmmm... can I have my season ticket back, please?
April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007