Minimal

stressed for motivation and achievement

2005-08-03

 

OK, Cancel, Apply

A typical property sheet with OK, Cancel and Apply buttonsI’m sure someone must’ve said this before, but I can’t help thinking the OK, Cancel and Apply buttons that appear on property sheets throughout Windows are a little... suboptimal. Ignoring the button order (that’s a whole other issue), there’s the confusing nature of the Cancel button. Everything makes sense until you press Apply for the first time. Now, the behaviour of the Cancel button is something you have to learn, not something you can intuit. Will it reverse the changes you just made by clicking Apply? Or will it act more as a Close button, keeping your applied changes?

Actually, you probably can intuit the behaviour — after all, it’s still enabled and it still says Cancel. It’ll reverse the changes, right? Well, no, it won’t. In fact, the Cancel button now works like a Close button; exactly the same as the OK button at this point. Once you start making changes again, it becomes a Cancel for the new changes. The problem is that at no point in this transformation of roles does the button indicate its new behaviour e.g. by becoming a Close button or by greying out.

Perhaps the interface designers figured a changing button would be more confusing than the implemented behaviour. OR perhaps the OK/Cancel/Apply triplet was fatally flawed from the outset. But what might’ve been better? How about OK, Cancel and Preview? While the observed behaviour of a Preview button would be the same as that for Apply, there’s less confusion over whether it’s a permanent setting. If I cancel after previewing, I definitely expect the original settings to be restored. The behaviour of the Cancel button has become consistent for the duration of the property sheet’s existence. Predictability is back and the user feels in control again.

Or have I missed something important?


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?