I’m sure someone must’ve said this before, but I can’t help thinking the OK, Cancel and Apply buttons that appear on property sheets throughout Windows are a little... suboptimal. Ignoring the button order (that’s a whole other issue), there’s the confusing nature of the Cancel button. Everything makes sense until you press Apply for the first time. Now, the behaviour of the Cancel button is something you have to learn, not something you can intuit. Will it reverse the changes you just made by clicking Apply? Or will it act more as a Close button, keeping your applied changes?
Actually, you probably can intuit the behaviour — after all, it’s still enabled and it still says Cancel. It’ll reverse the changes, right? Well, no, it won’t. In fact, the Cancel button now works like a Close button; exactly the same as the OK button at this point. Once you start making changes again, it becomes a Cancel for the new changes. The problem is that at no point in this transformation of roles does the button indicate its new behaviour e.g. by becoming a Close button or by greying out.
Perhaps the interface designers figured a changing button would be more confusing than the implemented behaviour. OR perhaps the OK/Cancel/Apply triplet was fatally flawed from the outset. But what might’ve been better? How about OK, Cancel and Preview? While the observed behaviour of a Preview button would be the same as that for Apply, there’s less confusion over whether it’s a permanent setting. If I cancel after previewing, I definitely expect the original settings to be restored. The behaviour of the Cancel button has become consistent for the duration of the property sheet’s existence. Predictability is back and the user feels in control again.
Or have I missed something important?
April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007