Minimal

stressed for motivation and achievement

2005-11-03

 

A couple of things I miss from the agile approach

If you’ve read this blog at all in the past couple of weeks, you’ll know I recently moved from a development job using agile methods to one using a much more traditional BDUF approach. It’s slowly helping me figure out what was good about agile and, perhaps, what wasn’t. Here are a couple of the things I currently miss:

Teamwork and having help available in the form of a pairing partner

Granted, in my last job, we didn’t always pair program. We told ourselves we should do, but we didn’t. However, if you were to suggest pairing on a particular task or request assistance via pairing, the help was always there. In my new job, it’s back to the old “you’re interrupting my work” school of thought. In my eyes, it’s everyone’s work. Yours is mine and mine is yours. Now take one for the team and get over here.

Daily updates

Monday morning, 10am, is when I now get my weekly dose of updates from my team mates. It’s a truly dull affair. The team leader buys us all a coffee from the in-house Starbucks-a-like, but it feels like a trade for your attendance. We all grab a seat (yes, it’s a sit-down affair) and jabber for 5 minutes each about what we’ve been doing while everyone else’s brain switches off. We’re then told what we’re working on in the next week and on to the next person. It’s boring and there’s no energy to it. No passion at all.

At least with agile’s daily stand-up meetings it felt like there was a purpose. The meetings were far shorter, punchier, more topical and, of course, more frequent. This meant they could be a lot more useful in terms of highlighting and managing risks. It also gave the project a feeling of momentum that I’m not getting right now.

As hinted above, this is, of course, only one side of the coin. I suspect there are also things about agile that I don’t miss as much as you might expect. Maybe I’ll blog about them another time.


Comments:
Mal said: "At least with agile’s daily stand-up meetings it felt like there was a purpose. The meetings were far shorter, punchier, more topical and, of course, more frequent."

If the meetings are uninspiring and there's no passion I don't think you can blame the meeting format for that. The job of the team leader (who I assume chairs the meeting every time?) should be to attempt to inject that passion and inspire when it is needed. And I don't think bribing with coffees is a substitute for leading from the front - it says "Look, we have to do this, so let's please tolerate it if you don't mind".

We only have weekly meetings but the chair rotates so everybody gets a go at running the show and to be honest, if we get to a weekly and anybody is surprised at what is said then something has already gone wrong. The team's always talking regardless of what day of the week it is.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   May 2003   June 2003   July 2003   August 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   August 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   January 2005   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?