Yesterday morning, while the rest of the country grieved at the loss of a former footballer with a drink problem, I sat in shock at the news that Richard Burns had died. I’m still devastated. I’d always thought surely it was only a matter of time before he recovered from the tumour and made his comeback. Alas, it didn’t work out like that. Man, life can be so random at times. :(
Rest in peace, Burnsie.
6 months I’ve been anticipating this moment. Finally, my bank statement has something significant in the “money in” column. No more do I have to watch my savings dwindle away. At last, I can relax a little.
Right then... back to the endless indecision over what car I’ll get next. Evo Knowledge, here I come. :)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Looks like my plan to go and see Ghost in the Shell: Innocence at the Tyneside Cinema tonight was somewhat flawed. Its run ended last night. I can’t believe I’ve been waiting for this film for so long and still managed to miss it. Gutted. :-(
Yet another former colleague joins the ranks of those with a weblog. Please welcome Duncan Graham. :)
While he works in the same software development company as Gavin, Dave and others, Duncan offers a different perspective on agile to balance most of what you’ll read around here. Not sure how much he’ll be blogging on the topic, but it’s always been an interesting debate when he’s commented on my posts in the past.
Three weeks in and I’m royally sick of the formal clothes policy. My iron has even packed up in shock (seriously, I’ve killed it). My razor, too, is becoming alarmingly blunt. And, to cap it all, I’ve just discovered that the semi-fashionable formal pants I bought the other week are dry-clean-only. Feck. How I wish every day were a dress-down Friday.
...is the name of a new hot chocolate drink from the coffee shop at work. By god, it’s gorgeous. And spicy—it’s your regular hot chocolate, but infused with cinnamon, various other spices a dash of chilli. A killer combo. I suspect I’ll be getting one or two more of these puppies as the winter closes in. :)
Ooooh... controversial! ;)
I’ve just booked my place at the XPDay 2005 conference, happening in London at the end of the month. It’ll be my third year in a row, but it’s the first time I’ve struggled to find stuff in the programme that will maintain my interest throughout. There even seems to be an unfilled slot in the schedule at the end of the second day. It’s making me wonder, “Has the agile bubble burst?”. [more...]
Last year, the programme was chock full of interesting topics, many of them being discussed as fairly fresh issues in the community. There was even a session on how usability work can survive in an agile environment. Usability, after all, benefits from the kind of holistic treatment that agile development so abhors. The only conclusion I could draw at the end of the talks was that the two are not particularly comfortable bed fellows.
Sure, it’s still possible to create great UIs with an agile approach, but frequent releases containing frequent redesigns to cater for evolving feature sets can put a strain on customer relationships. It’s only a particularly perverse user who revels in re-learning interaction and navigation every month or so.
Anyway, I’ve seen nothing in the past year that suggests the agile community has resolved these opposing forces. Perhaps it’s run out of answers? And perhaps that’s reflected in this year’s XPDay programme? Or maybe the lack of outstanding new presentations is down to the discipline coming to maturity. I don’t know. Maybe I’ll find out on the 28th and 29th.
P.S. Gav and Linz: please don’t take this as me dissing your presentation. I’m just giving a general impression of the programme. While I’ll be skipping your talk, it’s only because I know I can chat to you guys any time I like. :)
If you’ve read this blog at all in the past couple of weeks, you’ll know I recently moved from a development job using agile methods to one using a much more traditional BDUF approach. It’s slowly helping me figure out what was good about agile and, perhaps, what wasn’t. Here are a couple of the things I currently miss:
Granted, in my last job, we didn’t always pair program. We told ourselves we should do, but we didn’t. However, if you were to suggest pairing on a particular task or request assistance via pairing, the help was always there. In my new job, it’s back to the old “you’re interrupting my work” school of thought. In my eyes, it’s everyone’s work. Yours is mine and mine is yours. Now take one for the team and get over here.
Monday morning, 10am, is when I now get my weekly dose of updates from my team mates. It’s a truly dull affair. The team leader buys us all a coffee from the in-house Starbucks-a-like, but it feels like a trade for your attendance. We all grab a seat (yes, it’s a sit-down affair) and jabber for 5 minutes each about what we’ve been doing while everyone else’s brain switches off. We’re then told what we’re working on in the next week and on to the next person. It’s boring and there’s no energy to it. No passion at all.
At least with agile’s daily stand-up meetings it felt like there was a purpose. The meetings were far shorter, punchier, more topical and, of course, more frequent. This meant they could be a lot more useful in terms of highlighting and managing risks. It also gave the project a feeling of momentum that I’m not getting right now.
As hinted above, this is, of course, only one side of the coin. I suspect there are also things about agile that I don’t miss as much as you might expect. Maybe I’ll blog about them another time.
For me sins, I’m still in the office at ten to ten. It’s kinda spooky. The lights in here keep on going out when they detect no significant movement for a while. I have to keep on waving my arms around like a fool every ten minutes or so. Weird.
Actually, I’ll confess: I quite enjoy it. I just hope no-one in the block opposite me notices. :-)
Last week at work, I was passed the company’s coding standard for C# and .NET. It was a Word doc, 28 (twenty-eight) pages long. It was supported by two other documents, one of them 10 pages and the other 18 pages long. Is it just me, or does 56 pages of coding standard / best practice sound a little OTT?
Worse than that, I found it disrespectful. Its excessively prescriptive nature implictly credits the developer with no common sense. How is that meant to build mutual respect, trust and team spirit? A 28 page document’s good for little more than rolling up and using to bash people over the head, IMHO.
Incidentally, I only found out there was a standard after having submitted my own. Mine was 1 page long. It said stuff like “Use FxCop,” “Turn on XML documentation” and “Format things the way Visual Studio does”. I know which standard I’d rather be maintaining, but I guess I wasted my time. :-/
April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007